Pushing Big Rocks: Why Some Ideas Move Forward and Others Get Stuck
In the early days of a startup, when the mission is clear and the team is small, pushing big ideas — the “rocks” that define strategic direction — feels natural. Everyone is aligned and hands-on, and there’s a shared sense of urgency to get the rock up the hill.
But as companies grow, things start to change. Some people keep pushing, but others step aside — some question whether the rock should even be moved at all. Internal politics, competing priorities, and inertia take hold. And sometimes, the rock stops moving entirely — buried under meetings, PowerPoint decks, and endless discussions.
The reality is that big companies don’t always push big rocks better. They often struggle more than smaller, focused companies. I’ve seen this firsthand at Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, and Cisco — where large-scale initiatives with massive potential never saw the light of day, only to be executed brilliantly by smaller, more agile competitors.
Theoretically, a large company should have all the advantages — resources, talent, and scale. However, aligning thousands of employees, stakeholders, and decision-makers is hard when no one owns the rock outright, incentives are misaligned, or execution is bogged down — even the most promising initiatives stall.
Meanwhile, smaller companies don’t just push the rock — they become the rock. It’s their entire focus, and they move fast because they have no choice.
The lesson? Big companies often hesitate, while smaller companies commit. And when execution slows, it’s not because the rock is too heavy — it’s because no one is really pushing.
So, why do big companies often struggle despite their massive advantages? The answer lies in culture, alignment, and execution — and whether or not mechanisms exist to sustain accountability.
One of the biggest execution killers in large companies? PowerPoint.
A beautifully crafted slide deck is not execution — it’s an illusion of progress. In many organizations, ideas spend months (or years) circulating in endless loops of reviews, approvals, and “alignment meetings.” Instead of doing the work, people spend time perfecting slides to talk about the work.
The more a rock stays in PowerPoint, the less likely it is to move uphill.
I’ve written before about the importance of mechanisms in sustaining accountability (see my post on Amazon’s Weekly Business Review). Amazon understands that real progress isn’t measured in slides but in metrics, ownership, and execution. They replaced PowerPoint-driven meetings with narrative-based documents that force deeper thinking, real accountability, and next-step decisions.
Without mechanisms, everything is just a good intention. And good intentions, without execution, are meaningless.
Great companies don’t rely on belief alone — they build systems that drive accountability up and down the organization. Great companies have executives who dive deep and appreciate the details. Common mechanisms scale from the most junior employee to the most senior. My time as a General Manager at Amazon Web Services reinforced this more than any other. At Amazon, these mechanisms ensured that:
Because, in the end, it’s not just about believing in the rock. It’s about making sure it actually gets to the top of the hill.
And if you don’t push it, someone else will.
If your company struggles to turn big ideas into execution, I can help. At Bodhi Venture Labs, I work with leaders to implement mechanism-driven approaches that ensure accountability, alignment, and momentum — so your most significant opportunities don’t get lost in PowerPoint.
📩 Let’s talk. Reach out to me at Bodhi Venture Labs, and let’s build a system that gets your rocks to the top of the hill.